Measured, not promised What the engine did on twenty simulated businesses.
We test the engine on twenty simulated businesses with synthetic data, from insurance
claims and payments to factory floors and energy markets. We compare it with an AI agent
built the common way, which asks an AI model for every decision. Here is what we measured.
4,377 of 4,377
Engine decisions right
Field test on five simulated businesses with synthetic data, October 6, 2026.
0
Wrong engine decisions
Every decision the engine made itself, on all 20 simulated businesses (synthetic data, 1,000 events each, October 9, 2026). The engine currently decides cases in 14 of them.
Milliseconds
Instead of seconds
Typical decision: 17–31 ms for the engine vs 3.3–4.2 s for an AI-only agent. Five simulated businesses, synthetic data, October 8, 2026.
0 AI calls
For the engine's own decisions
Same simulated runs, synthetic data: per 1,000 decisions, the AI-only agent made 329–1,519 AI calls; Cognitive + AI mode made 0–14. Most AI-only figures are scaled up from runs capped at 300 calls.
Consistent when the AI changes
Same decision, two days, two different AI answers.
On the same simulated factory decision, an AI-only agent using the same AI model and the
same instructions scored 97% one day and 20.5% the next. The engine's proven rule decided
the same 865 readings on both days, and got none of them wrong.
All figures were measured by Nexgile in October 2026 on simulated businesses with synthetic
data. “Right” means matching each simulated business's own policy. They show the method,
not a customer's results, and do not by themselves prove the engine is ready for live use.